The federal government exercises tight control over the electromagnetic spectrum, for example, and it claims authority to impose public-utility-style regulation of internet service provision in. If the government was to regulate the internet, the american people ‘for example’ would lose an important toll to exercise their freedom of expression (bidgoli, 264) in addition to freedom of speech, internet responsibility should be left on the hands of the parent. States government must cease trying to reduce privacy and censorship on the internet, because it limits the right freedom of speech, builds mistrust towards the government, and it wastes resources better spent on other types of law enforcement.
On thursday, the federal communications commission (fcc) voted to regulate internet providers as public utilities under a 1934 lawpresident obama celebrated this ruling, which the fcc based on. The federal government should be allowed to (and will) define and regulate what is legal and illegal to possess, transmit, make or sell that's a given and to be expected as they do with all other legislation. Allowing the federal government to regulate the internet will grind innovation to a halt and send engineers into exile. Internet regulation: policing cyberspace the internet is a method of communication and a source of information that is becoming more popular among those who are interested in, and have the time to surf the information superhighway.
The fcc's restoring internet freedom order, which took effect on june 11, provides a framework for protecting an open internet while paving the way for better, faster and cheaper internet access for consumers. With guest host anthony brooks theresa may says the internet must be regulated following the london bridge attack so, how do you regulate cyberspace and should we britain's prime minister. Similarly, a survey conducted last year by the pew internet & american life project found 66 percent of adults said current privacy laws are “not good enough” to protect internet users.
Since the establishment of icann, the us government's stated goal has been to minimize the role of governments in managing the internet government advice is important, as is the advice of other. The government should lightly overlook what people put on and look up on the internet because there can be disturbing things put on the internet and should not be shown for all the public, but they should not be over protective for it. The new rules “do not regulate the internet,” wheeler said in an faq published last week “it applies to broadband providers—the companies that connect people’s homes to the public.
The internet currently operates as an industry – meaning we have internet providers and the selling of bandwidth connections of course, the government should not regulate what goes on the internet – as is protected by the first amendment – however, there needs to be basic industry regulation of the internet. The government is dreaming to have the control: to view all the information circulating the web, to read our private e-mails, to peek into chat rooms, and to restrict us, the internet people, in any way possible. The internet should be regulated by the government, just as other venues of media and commerce are there is no plausible reason that something on the internet should be exempt from intellectual property and commercial laws, as well as laws that cover other forms of media such as television and radio.
While the previous discussion has centered on the federal government’s approach to internet privacy, foreign governments increasingly have sought to regulate privacy (and, in particular, data. The fcc's pending ruling on net neutrality is raising concerns that it eventually would exert tighter control over internet content, but proponents say the measure simply would ensure companies. Some people believe that the internet should be regulated and censored others disapprove of any kind of censorship because they feel that the internet is a vent through which the oppressed can express their opinion.